I have no idea how to create pages but I'll figure it out eventually godammit

Showing posts with label Jay Bruce. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Jay Bruce. Show all posts

Wednesday, July 22, 2009

2009 Allen & Ginter Box Break: Pack 11

Halfway home! Here's the plan for the rest of the week: Get the first half of the box in my binder. Go over the posts and figure out the Gint-a-Cuffs scoring. Post all that mess to get caught up. Then... A SURPRISE. But for now, here's hit #2 from the box.

230 Torii Hunter
246 General Custer
171 Brett Anderson
312 AJ Burnett SP +5 points
AGR-JB Jay Bruce jersey +8 points x 5 Favorite Player = 40 points
292 Eric Chavez A&G Mini +2 points
NP43 Jose Lopez NP

BRUUUUUUUCE. Relic + favorite player bonus = ??? I'll figure it out soon enough. That's two of three hits in the box though. Rootin' for a real kickass one for #3. Torii looks apprehensive on his card and that makes me sad. I guess lightning just doesn't strike twice. The General Custer card if pretty cool although the permanent association I have for him is a dicey Robin Williams joke about former Georgia Governor Lester Maddox. The rest of the pack is uninteresting except for the fact that I just realized that the first half of the box has a run of National Pride cards from number 43 to 52. I have a feeling that National Pride is not going to be an easy set to build by ripping packs.

And, cause I gotta show 'em:

Chavez A&G mini that I hope gets me more points than I lose...

And this rather meh SP. An SP's an SP, I suppose.

Thursday, May 7, 2009

Upside down question

I'm always intrigued when I get a comment on a post that's six months old. Reader justjennie71 left a comment on my conspiracy theory post about the 2008 Topps Updates and Highlights inverted photo errors:

I'm a new collector, just started a few months ago. I bought a pack of the U&H's at Fred Meyer and one of the upside down Jay Bruce Rookie Cards (UH100) was in the pack. How do you know what the value is on one of these?
tl;dr version for anyone wou doesn't wan the Econ 101 lesson: About 30 bucks give or take a Hamilton or two most likely. Read on if you want to know how I came up with this number.

The first place I go to check is here. Good 'ol eBay. The best place to find out the value of something is to see what other people are actually paying for it. Do a search for the card and see what the prices are on the cards. Even better is to check the completed auction listings to see what the final auction price were for the cards. Here's an example of completed listings for "Ken Griffey Jr. Rookie Card". You have to have an eBay account to see these listings but if you do, you'll see that a Junior rookie sold anywhere from $50 for an Upper Deck rookie to sixteen cents for a Fleer rookie. In this case we have a slight problem, because I couldn't find a single Jay Bruce inverted error card for sale.

So now what do we do? There were two other inverted short print variations in the set, of Kosuke Fukudome and Evan Longoria. I couldn't find a Fukudome, but I did find a Longoria with a buy it now price of $60. This is a good baseline for the value of a short print variation card but still isn't exactly the same. Bruce and Longoria aren't the same player and have different collecting bases. Ok, eBay can't help, so let's try some other card selling sites. A Google shopping search also came up empty. Sportlots also had no Bruce variation offered for sale. Finally Naxcom/Sportsbuy gives us a result. If you look under the #21 best selling item on that page, you'll see a sale price of $40 or best offer for the Bruce variation. Unfortunately, if you click on the auction, it is no longer listed. So there's a start, the Bruce that you have at one time was being offered for $40, and a similar variation of a different player is on sale for $60. So now what? Where do we go from here?

Check a price guide like Tuff Stuff or, ahem, Beckett.


(brief pause to let the howling subside)


Price guides are just that. A guide to the approximate value of a collectible. The actual value is what someone will actually pay you for the card. A friend of mine back in my college days one told me that my entire card collection was worthless because I'd never ever actually sell any of the cards. I was probably showing off the prices of them in my Beckett at the time. Ultimately, he was right, I've sold off very few cards and the ones I was bragging about in the early '90s sure as hell don't have the same number in the price guide they used to have. So remember it's a guide, not an absolute value. You can see real life examples of this in this post.

So, back to Bruce. I hit the Wally World magazine rack this morning and checked the value of your Bruce in the most recent Beckett Baseball, the one with Griffey on the cover. According to the guise the price ranges from LO $20, to HI $50 for the Bruce. Now, there's a lot of confusion about what LO and HI means. Some say HI is the price you would pay at a shop and LO is the price you would get if you sold the card to a shop. Others see it as the difference between a mint copy and a not-so-mint copy. Far too many see the HI price as an Edict from The Lord on the exact value of the card that must be upheld at all costs lest you fall into Sin. These ideas are all incorrect.

Basically what those numbers mean is that is the approximate price people were willing to pay for that card a month or two ago. I think at one time there was purportedly some sort of complicated formula where Beckett polled hobby shops and auctions and the like and put the prices into a computer and after some gyrating and billowing smoke, the final numbers would pop out. I don't know exactly how they do it today, but the fact of the matter is that Beckett is trusted by enough collectors to make whatever numbers end up printed on that page actually mean something in the hobby. If you were to try to sell or buy the card it is entirely reasonable that the price would fall into that $20-$50 range.

However, there are still a lot of economic factors to consider. The set has been out for 6 months so a lot of the people who desperately wanted that card have already gotten it and moved on to other pursuits. Jay Bruce is playing well right now, so collectors might be more interested in the card. The economy is a wreck so many people who could at one time blow a lot of dough on a card like thins might be putting that money towards trying to pay the mortgage. There are very few of the cards actually for sale, so if there are two collectors out there who desperately want the card a single auction listing might end up causing a bidding war. This is all just basic economics, supply and demand. Since that magazine was printed at least a month ago, economic conditions may have changed so you can't use that price as an absolute value, but it is a good starting point.

Say you want to sell the card on eBay. The guide can help you decide how to sell it. If you had no idea what it was worth, just that it was rare, and listed it at $1000, you'd likely get laughed off the internet and be out of a large listing fee when no one bought the card. Knowing the price guide range, you could list it at a $50 buy it now which is more reasonable. It could be snapped up immediately, get a lowball best offer bid or be ignored completely at that price. If you went the pure auction route and opened the bidding at 99 cents you'd have a shot at selling it for more than expected while risking that it will go for less than you wanted. The card could go for the 99 cent opening bid (it's doubtful it would go without any bids at all) or a sniper war could erupt and it could sell for $100 or more. It all depends on the luck of the draw and who is willing to bid on the card. If one guy bids $100 to open up the bids and he is the only one to bid on the card, then the card may be worth $100 to him, but it's selling for 99 cents because no one else valued it at all. That's why seeing the value as a flexible price range is so important. If 100 Bruce variations were auctioned in the space of a month and the average price of the sales was $30, there are still going to be outliers like the $100 bidding war and the 99 cent bargain. That doesn't mean that the card is worth $30, or $100, or 99 cents. It means that it's worth about thirty bucks give or take a few bucks up or down depending on who is buying at that particular moment.

So the value on that card is most likely somewhere in between 20 and 50 bucks but there's no guarantee you can sell it for that price. At any rate, it's a nice pull of a good player (even though the variation is quite stupid in my opinion) and you picked it up in a retail pack from Fred Meyer. Good luck with the collecting, I hope this answered your question.

Sunday, April 26, 2009

Warped Priorities

The Braves are getting pounded by the Reds...

But Jay Bruce has gotten me two desperately needed home runs for my fantasy team.

(I'm still probably going to lose this week)

Tuesday, May 27, 2008

Bruce on the Loose

Jay Bruce is finally being called up to the Reds today. A little over a week (or a couple of days, I'm not really sure) before Topps Series 2 is scheduled to ship. Question is, did Topps pull him from the set already? Was he even in it to begin with? I'm not really even sure whether Series two is coming out this Wednesday or next Wednesday actually. I've heard both dates from different people. I guess we'll find out soon, won't we...

(psssst... His 2008 card isn't his real rookie anyway)


(double psssst... It's not this card either. Try 2005)

Friday, May 9, 2008

Whither Jay Bruce?

Topps Series 2 comes out in about three weeks. I haven't quite gotten around to previewing it yet and I don't want to get into that now. I don't know a whole lot about the nuts and bolts of actually producing cards but you'd think with three weeks to go, Topps has to be deep in the process of printing and packaging these cards, right? Well, check out the sell sheet, specifically this page. I know what you're thinking... why the hell do we need Silk cards?? Does anyone even collect those things? Don't worry about that, it's not important now. Check out the card they have featured as their "rookie" card example.


That's Jay Bruce. Reds fans and people who follow baseball closely recognize him as the Reds' top prospect and someone who could be a star very soon. There's only one problem: he still hasn't been called up to the big leagues. For some reason, this rookie of the year caliber prospect is hopelessly blocked by Corey Patterson. Now, I like Corey. He's an Atlanta native and the high school he went to is right down the road from where I live. He's got some serious talent, but let's face facts, he hasn't put it together yet and right now he stinks. Leadoff hitters should not be hitting .200 with a .260 on base percentage. Meanwhile Jay is mashing in Triple-A Louisville, Jerry Hairston is stealing at bats from Patterson and Dusty Baker isn't even thinking about calling up Bruce.

Now this is pretty bad for the Reds, sure, but what about Topps? Did Topps just get Alex Gordon'd again? Will we be seeing cut out cards going for three figures on eBay? Will there be a run on Wal-Mart Blasters? Will Keith Olbermann be spending all his Democratic Primary overtime checks on Bruce cards? Probably not, actually. Bruce isn't in the Series two preliminary checklist, although Topps probably wanted him to take up one of the "TBA" slots. Kosuke Fukudome isn't going to carry this set. Topps is also inserting rookie redemption cards into boxes this year like they've done with Finest. This is a disaster for people who actually want to collect the set, but it gives Topps a chance to wait out Dusty Baker and release that Bruce card after all. Why they can't just wait until Series 3 Updates & Highlights to introduce Jay to the card world, I don't know. It means less decent rookies for the end of the year product and 20 short prints for the set collectors to worry about. Plus there's gonna be a gimmick card, you know there is... Clinton/McCain Campaign 2008 card, maybe?